Getting My case laws 506 b ppc pre arrest bail To Work

In addition into the primary punishment, the court could also impose a fine over the offender. The fine’s amount is in the discretion in the court and is intended to serve as an additional deterrent.

In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative of the law laid down from the Supreme Court within the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. As a result, the competent authority of your parent department of the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and spend the pension amount and other ancillary benefits to your petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority in the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits from the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Section 302 of your Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application of the death penalty or life imprisonment depends to the specifics of every case, including any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced on the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is click here topic for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government agencies in regards to projects that could likely pose a public risk. This case can also be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all upcoming public interest litigation brought before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found from the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is often a right to life itself.

48 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A just isn't obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are several of the relevant factors. Read more

In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may exist conflicts between the different reduced appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.

VI)     The petitioner is driving the bars since arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he is no more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him at the rear of the bars before summary of trial will serve no useful purpose.

When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only carried out Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to get looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to some healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it is important that the case founded the application in the precautionary principle where there can be a menace to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right into a clean and healthy environment.

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory legislation, which are founded by executive organizations based on statutes.